Showing posts with label modus operandi. Show all posts
Showing posts with label modus operandi. Show all posts

Monday, September 7, 2015

#YayaDiaries | Privacy of Employers

This is not a funny post. Hehe. I am writing this post because of recent events. So excuse me while I take a break from the usual, and post this sort-of rant about my nanny and the issue of privacy.

It started a few weeks ago, upon reading Mommy Fleur's post on her in-laws almost getting victimized by a budol-budol/ dugo-dugo gang. Almost, because although the helper already had valuables with her and was about to leave, the others who saw her knew something was up, and they were able to stop the helper from leaving. Two weeks ago, I learned from another friend that her sister got duped by someone who called their house knowing full details, including the maid's full name and mobile number. It was only after discussing the whole situation with family members that they came to realize that this happened a few days after someone from the census office came to do an interview.

A week ago, upon leaving our townhouse, I chanced upon our neighbor talking to someone at the gate. The lady turned out to be someone from the census office, doing a routine interview. As I walked past, the lady told me that she would need to interview me, too. Normally, I would oblige, but after what happened to Fleur's in-laws and to J's sister, I told the lady no. She was insistent, so I said "baka dugo-dugo gang kayo ha?" She then proceeds to show me her ID and her forms.

J says the man who came to her sister's house had forms and an ID as well. He was even wearing a baranggay vest, and looked legit. And although they didn't get to verify if the man was the culprit, he was the only one who recently got the helper's new number and full name, because according to him, they needed a number in case the form wasn't filled up correctly.

Fast forward to my experience with the census lady. I told Yaya J not to give the lady any information should she come back. Please note that this is my personal preference - I am not trying to impose my decision on this matter on anyone. If you want to cooperate with whoever comes to your house to ask for any information of any kind, that is entirely up to you and your judgment call. Again, this is my preference. I am not trying to influence you to lean towards withholding information.

So anyway, the lady did come back. And again. And again. Friday morning, she came back with reinforcement. Friday evening, while working on the bread deco for a bento order, Yaya J tells me about the census people.

Y: "Bumalik ulit yung taga-Census."
K: "Ay nako, 'wag kang magbibigay ng kahit anong information. Kahit ano. Huwag."
Y: "Sabi ko nga, 'di ka magpapa-interview. E ang kulit, kaya ako nalang daw tatanungin nila."
K: "Ya, sabi ko kahit ano. Ba't ka magpapa-interview??!"
Y: "E ako lang naman tinanong nila. Pangalan ko lang binigay ko."
K: "Ang kulit mo din, ano? Hindi mo ba ma-gets ang sinabi ko. 'Wag mo na sila kausapin."
Y: "E kasi nga, gusto ka nga daw nila kausapin. Sabi ko wala ka, tapos tinanong kung andito si Sir, sabi ko hindi siya dito nakatira kasi hiwalay kayo at tayo lang andito."

Zip your mouth, Yaya! Please!
At that point, I couldn't help myself, and told her to stop. She volunteered information that need not be said. Why'd she have to tell them R didn't live here? If these people were part of a dugo-dugo gang, then this is their red flag: NO MALE IN THE HOUSE. Needless to say, I got pissed. She got a sermon about keeping things private.

You would think she learned her lesson. 

This morning, Yaya J walked RL and I to the car. Our other neighbor was talking to some men (apparently from the electric company) by the gate, but left them to get something. As Yaya J walked past, I overheard one of the men ask her about this particular neighbor. Apparently, they had missed a payment, and these men were trying to push the fact that a notice was sent to this address. So these men were trying to get information from my nanny. They asked if the neighbor owned the house and if bills addressed to them were received. As my nanny opened her mouth to answer, I cut her off. I already heard her say that bills are received by the compound maids, and that these were given to the respective homeowners. Ang daldal talaga, I swear.

So as she walked me to the car, I gave her another lecture on privacy. We do not volunteer information. Especially when it involves strangers. Tonight, we will do PRIVACY 101 again. I don't care if she thinks I repeat myself over and over again, but we are being careful. And in this day and age, you can't be too careful with all these crimes happening left and right.

Makes me think, you know. If my nanny is more than willing to give information to strangers, I wonder what she tells the other helpers in the compound? Our Yaya J has been with us for 13 years (minus a few years when she went off to give birth to her two girls). I mean, I trust her, but man, she can be a chatterbox sometimes.

Less talk, less mistakes. No talk, no mistakes! Yaya naman!

What about your helpers? Do you have the same problem with them? Sigh.


DISCLAIMER: My personal opinion on the Census modus is just that - my opinion. I am not saying that these people are indeed criminals or part of some gang. I am merely being extra cautious. I mean, if it is easy for helpers to get NBI clearances, IDs and the like, but end up stealing, even poisoning their employers, how easy will it be for anyone else to get employed, don a uniform and present a legit ID? You can never tell if the person in front of you has an ulterior motive. 


Tuesday, October 7, 2014

#FYI | Mango-ong IPO Decision

And so... I am posting a copy of the IPO decision on the Mango-ong case. I am doing this as a favor to the many, many people who lost their hard-earned money because they were duped by certain individuals who make a living out of fraud. Don't get fooled. BE INFORMED.

INTERESTED IN FRANCHISING MANGO-ONG? READ THIS FIRST!

I received this from BG via email after I told him about the threats on my scam expose. So people, if the other party is still trying to convince you otherwise, shove these documents to their face! Irritates the heck out of me, knowing there are people in this world who live a life of lies.

Anyhoooo...

(Click on the photo to enlarge)

(Click on the photo to enlarge)

(Click on the photo to enlarge)

(Click on the photo to enlarge)

(Click on the photo to enlarge)

(Click on the photo to enlarge)

(Click on the photo to enlarge)

(Click on the photo to enlarge)

(Click on the photo to enlarge)


To verify the claims on this blog post, and the scam post, you may call GUBY CORPORATION/ GREEN MANGO-ONG FOOD CORP at (02) 332.4376.

Again, let me reiterate that I am in no way connected to Mango-ong or to Guby Corp. I am only a blogger who wishes that justice be served. God sees you, and He knows!

Tuesday, September 23, 2014

Mango-ong Update!

So. I just had a rough early afternoon. I received a threat on this blog post (chose not to publish the nasty comments). So I called up Mango-ong. Turns out they already won the IPO case! Green Mango-ong Food Corp is the legal owner of the Mango-ong trademark and business. I shall post the court decision when I get it from Mango-ong. Meanwhile, Mr. Anonymous (aka Jeje posting Jeje and text-speak on my blog post), if you're trying to scare me because you have nowhere to go and nothing do, may I please remind you that I am in no way connected to GMFC nor am I under their employ. I only stand for what is right.

I pray justice is served, and that everyone with unresolved cases get the justice you deserve (and your money back)!

Please be informed.

Read about the whole scam here.

EDIT: Mango-ong IPO Decision here. Don't be duped!

Wednesday, March 21, 2012

BEWARE: Mango-ong Franchise Scam!


That original Mango-ong post was a long read, so I decided to split the post into two. If you're looking for the MO/franchise scam post, you're on the right track. Read on.

I am a Mango-ong addict. It's official. I have it once a week. More if I run errands at SM, where you are most likely to find a kiosk or cart.

A few months ago, while searching for franchise information on Mango-ong, I came across a Facebook page. I liked the page (as I love the brand) and recently got this in my inbox:

BEWARE! Mango-ong is currently not open for Franchise. Don't be duped. 
Two weeks ago, I learned from BG, a good friend and ex-coworker (one I haven't been in touch with for years - he isn't on Facebook) that they actually own this gem of a business. WOW. We spent two hours on the phone discussing how he and his wife AG came up with the idea (they also own Chicharon Espesyal) and how they prayed for Mango-ong. And APPARENTLY, THEY HAVE NOT OFFERED FRANCHISING PACKAGES FOR MANGOONG.

So who owns the Mango-ong account on Facebook, pretending to be Mango-ong AND offering the business for franchise? 

I asked BG about that and about the letter I had received. He already had a name. And was quick to send me articles about this man posing as legit owner of Mango-ong. Man, if this poser owned Mango-ong, then why does my friend own and operate all Mango-ong branches in leading malls?

Apparently, this guy (not the same name on the letter above, but a certain JAC) has been a business copycat since who-knows-when. If you google for his name, you will find him in the middle of lawsuits for pretending to be this and that, and duping honest Filipinos of their hard-earned money. It is the same MO (modus operandi) he is now doing with Mango-ong. To date, there have been a number of so-called franchisees calling the legit Mango-ong office, asking for help because the poser can no longer be found. Having charged the would-be franchisee a sum of P400,000 for franchise fees and start-up stock/ equipment, he no longer shows up after receiving the lump sum.

And because BG and his original Mango-ong DOES NOT and currently has no plans to offer the business as franchise, these "investors" are at a loss. And as much as BG would want to help out these victims, clearly, he is also a victim here, what with this JAC guy using the Mango-ong business to his advantage and to the disadvantage of hapless Filipinos.

Already, legit Mango-ong stalls around the metro and nearby provinces have put up disclaimers denouncing the claim that they have offered the business for franchise. And for the general public to be aware of the ongoing scam... A scam that is well-thought of and well-planned! Apparently, would-be investors are even shown a commissary and a mango farm!

See that piece of paper? That disclaimer says they are NOT open for franchise.
The actual notice posted on all kiosks and carts of Mango-ong.  Potential investors, BEWARE!
I had asked BG about the likelihood of having competitors (as is with any booming Filipino business, competitors usually appear within the first 3 months of operation), and he actually doesn't mind the competition. But for a business whose name and concept have both been used maliciously to dupe clueless individuals? Then it is cause for concern, and of course, a lawsuit. Mind you, the Mango-ong poser JAC uses the same trade name AND logo, as well as kiosk design, concept, etc. What can be the motive behind the act of using the same trade name, logo and concept BUT to fool people into thinking you are the real thing.

Well people, I am sorry to say, it is NOT the real thing. Nope, there is only one Mango-ong.

EDIT: Mango-ong IPO Decision here. Don't be duped!


May I ask you readers to share this information on your social media accounts, blog, etc. such that we get the word out? Thank you.

http://www.mango-ong.com

Official Mango-ong Page on Facebook
Follow Mango-ong on Twitter
TRACK BACK: Read my review on Mango-ong HERE.

Related Posts with Thumbnails